Sunday, September 15, 2013

The Move to Armed Struggle


The move from passive resistance to the armed struggle                   
Thewodros Getachew
(thhe2011@gmail.com)                                                                                     September, 2013

I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve. But if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”  Nelson Mandela

April 20, 1964. 49 years ago Nelson Mandela made a historic speech “I Am Prepared to Die at the opening of the defense case in the Rivonia Trial at Pretoria Supreme Court. 




Mandela’s “I Am Prepared to Diespeech had more than 10, 696 words and the message were clear and direct to apartheid regime.   He made his statement at the Rivonia trial, with absolute defiant, determination and courage and explained to the court, the strong causality between the actions and policies of the apartheid state and the transition of ANC in to armed struggle finally by abandoned 49 years of commitment to non-violence struggle and set up an armed wing to confront the South African state with violence.  (The Manifesto of' The Spear of the Nation (Umkhonto )  16 December 1961) .

 Many think of Nelson Mandela as a man who advocates peaceful non-violence resistance only and spent decades in prison due to his opposition to Apartheid in South Africa.  However that it is wrong Nelson Mandela was in prison not for passive or peaceful resistance, but for his leadership role in the ANC military wing involved in an armed conflict against Apartheid South Africa.   Nelson Mandela continued to support armed struggle throughout his prison term.  He was  even offered conditional release in 1985 if he agreed to sign a document condemning  armed struggle/ terrorism( according to the state term)  and he refused, insisting that he had turned to armed struggle only when “all other forms of resistance were no longer open”, and demanding that the president of South Africa unban the ANC and “guarantee free political activity”. 
      
It is true that the ANC had a long history of non-violent struggle, but in the 1950s       Mandela saw that “fifty years of non-violence had brought the African people nothing but more and more repressive legislation, and fewer and fewer rights”.     Moreover, the Apartheid state had begun to use political violence as a normal tactic to suppress Africans protesting their second class status

In March 1960, 69 black anti-apartheid demonstrators were killed by police at Sharpeville.  The government declared a state of emergency and banned the African National Congress (ANC).       In response, the organization abandoned its policy of non-violence and Mandela helped establish the ANC's military wing 'Umkhonto we Sizwe' or 'The Spear of the Nation'.     He was appointed as commander-in-chief and travelled abroad to receive military training and to find support for the ANC.

I, and some colleagues, came to the conclusion that as violence in this country was inevitable; it would be unrealistic and wrong for African leaders to continue preaching peace and non-violence at a time when the Government met our peaceful demands with force”  Mandela

On his return he was arrested and sentenced to five years in prison.  In 1963, Mandela and other ANC leaders were tried for plotting to overthrow the government by violence. The following year Mandela was sentenced to life imprisonment. He was held in Robben Island prison, off the coast of Cape Town, and later in Pollsmoor Prison on the mainland. 


During his years in prison he became an international symbol of resistance to apartheid.

The 1961 decision of ANC to abandon forty-nine years of non-violence struggle was not taken recklessly.   The transition to armed struggle was shaped heavily by the conditions of government actions and policies created  and when the decision was made, ANC faced conditions amounting to what Mandela has accurately described as ‘submit or fight’, that the organization could either accept being outlawed or go underground and fight back.
"The time comes in the life of any nation when there remain only two choices – submit or fight. That time has now come to South Africa. We shall not submit and we have no choice but to hit back by all means in our power in defense of our people, our future, and our freedom.” The Manifesto of Umkhonto 16 December 1961
Apparently there have been relevant Similarities between the aftermath of 2005 Ethiopia general Election and the March 1960 Sharpeville massacre during Apartheid Era in South Africa.       At the same time the ANC (African National Congress) case with movements like Ginbot 7 popular Force (G7PF) and others.   
The May 2005 Ethiopia elections had presented the Ethiopian people a remarkable opportunity to express their political views by participating in a poll that, for the first time in history, offered a meaningful choice.  
Live televised debates on matters of public policy, opposition party access to state-owned media, and huge, peaceful rallies in the final week of campaigning (On May 8 the opposition’s campaign with an estimated over 1 million Ethiopians rallied in Meskel Square in the heart of Addis Ababa in a massive and peaceful political rally) made it clear that these elections would represent a decisive moment in Ethiopia’s political development. The Ethiopian people seized this opportunity with great hope and turned out in overwhelming numbers to express their choice.  Regardless of the precise allocation of seats, a huge number of voters sent an unmistakable message of “no confidence” to the party that has ruled for 14 years.  
Right after the polling day the regime learning that the public had voted for the opposition groups, especially in the major cities across the country and on May 16, 2005 the Prime Minister declared a “State of Emergency”.  In the Capital Addis Ababa peaceful gatherings and demonstrations were banned. The Prime Minister personally took a direct command of the Police and security forces. On May 17 2005, when less that 20% of the total votes were counted, the regime declared the election victory. It was then Controversies relating to the counting process, subsequent allegations of fraud, and post-electoral violence which threaten to return Ethiopia to the more repressive politics of the past.  A dangerous new context began to emerge.  The main opposition coalition (CUDP) had been shattered and its leaders imprisoned; civil society leaders and the independent press had been harassed and intimidated into silence; and the regime found it necessary to use massive levels of military force against civilians and murdered over 193 citizens  and  arrest thousands upon thousands of youths.  In two weeks alone nearly 100,000 innocent citizens were sent to camps and prisons, and were subjected to in human and degrading treatment.  
The whole country was turned into a mass concentration camp.  In December 2005, 131 opposition politicians (including 10 elected members of parliament), journalists, and civil society leaders were charged with crimes that included treason and even genocide.
 The aftermath of the 2005 election heavily shaped several opposition Movements to employ all kinds and means of struggle to reach their stated goal by abandoned the commitment to non-violence struggle and set up an armed wing.  
The transition to armed struggle by opposition groups were a direct result the government actions and policies.  It was, therefore the continuance of these and similar litany of repression, degradation, trampling on individual and national pride that resulted in the formation of the Movement like, Ginbot 7 and others.
Ginbot7 Popular Force (GPF) makes official announcement on its formation and calls on all freedom loving Ethiopians to join the resistance against tyranny on December 20, 2012.   The calls on the oppressed people of Ethiopia to join the resistance and rise up in arms against the Tigray People Liberation Front (TPLF) led dictatorial regime of Ethiopia.  GPF has taken this radical step because the alternative will be forfeiting to tyranny all rights and dignity associated with being human and a citizen of Ethiopia.  




“….It was only when all else had failed, when all channels of peaceful protest had been barred to us, that the decision was made to embark on violent forms of political struggle…” Mandela

 

The choice [to move to armed struggle] is not ours; it has been made by the Nationalist government which has rejected ever peaceable demand by the people for rights and freedom and answered ever such demand with force and yet more force   Mandela
As mentioned in its Mission statement Ginbot7 Popular Force (GPF) is committed to the forceful removal of the dictatorial regime of the TPLF, usher the condition for peaceful and democratic transition, play a part in the creation of a strong and capable national defense, security and police force whose only allegiance is to the constitution of the land, thereby, bringing an end to the existing affiliation of these institutions to the political forces in the country.  
 “…It was only when all else had failed, when all channels of peaceful protest had been barred to us, that the decision was made to embark on violent forms of political struggle…” Mandela
 It is absolutely visible to anyone that the regime in Ethiopia has no desire for any kind of political dialoged and a commitment for genuine democracy and freedom.  The hopes for peaceful political transition were vanished.    Hence Ginbot7 Popular Force (GPF) and other opposition groups who have had enough of atrocity, who can no longer take humiliation, who yearn for freedom/liberty are on the move from passive to the armed resistance as a part of the struggle for the creation of a nation where in each and every Ethiopian enjoys the full respect of its democratic and human rights, achieves economic prosperity and social justice, and the respect of the citizen’s life, safety and human dignity.
 “…All lawful modes of expressing opposition to this principle had been closed by legislation, and we were placed in a position in which we had either to accept a permanent state of inferiority, or to defy the Government.  We chose to defy the law. We first broke the law in a way which avoided any recourse to violence; when this form was legislated against, and then the Government resorted to a show of force to crush opposition to its policies, only then did we decide to answer violence with violence…..” Nelson Mandela

Finally few specific similarities between the aftermath of 2005 Ethiopia Election and the March 1960 Sharpeville massacre during Apartheid Era in South Africa:

Ø  0n March 21, 1960, 69 black anti-apartheid demonstrators were killed by South Africa apartheid government police at Sharpeville. 

In November 2005 the Ethiopia regime military forces murdered over 193 peaceful demonstrators in Addis Ababa.

Ø  On March 30, 1960 the South Africa apartheid government declared a state of emergency.

On May 16, 2005 the Prime Minister declared a “State of Emergency”.

Ø  The South Africa apartheid state banned the African National Congress (ANC).

The main Ethiopia opposition coalition (CUD) had been shattered and its leaders imprisoned.

Ø  In 1963, Mandela and other ANC leaders were tried for plotting to overthrow the government by violence. The following year Mandela was sentenced to life imprisonment.

In December 2005, 131 Ethiopia opposition politicians, journalists, and civil society leaders were charged with crimes that included treason and even genocide and late many of them sentenced to life imprisonment.

Ø  ANC decided  to abandon forty-nine years of non-violence struggle  with  `The Manifesto of' The Spear of the Nation (Umkhonto )  December 16, 1961

May 2008 former members of CUD founded a political movement called Ginbot 7     Movement for Justice Freedom and Democracy lead by Dr. Berhanu Nega.     The movement decided to employs all kinds and means of struggle to reach its stated goal.   

Ginbot7 Popular Force (GPF) makes official announcement on its formation and calls on all freedom loving Ethiopians to join the armed resistance against tyranny on December 20, 2012.

Ø  The actions and policies of the apartheid state were the sole responsible for the transition of ANC in to armed struggle finally by abandoned 49 years of commitment to non-violence struggle and set up an armed wing to confront the South African state with violence.

The aftermath of the 2005 Ethiopian election heavily shaped several opposition Movements to employ all kinds and means of struggle to reach their stated goal by abandoned the commitment to non-violence struggle and set up an armed wing.

                 Note

-Nelson Mandela’s quotations are taken from “I am prepared to Die”, the speech    given at the opening of the defense case at the Rivonia trial

Reference

-I am Prepared to Die Statement (20 April 1964)
-The Manifesto of' ` The Spear of the Nation` (Umkhonto December 16, 1961).
-Ginbot7 Popular Force (GPF) mission statement 

No comments:

Post a Comment